Eleventh Post

This post is about the physical sensation of emotions. Or, more accurately, how I perceive emotions and how I know which emotion it is. I usually perceive the bodily changes first and then realise which emotion it is exactly – or not so exactly. Of course I cognitively recognise which emotion is or would be appropriate in most situations before feeling it, but often I do not “just feel” it; especially negative emotions are difficult to differentiate for me. Joy is easier, more immediate.

Sadness

I recognise sadness as a kind of pressure on my chest, difficulties breathing in, a painful sensation radiating from the bridge of my nose towards my eyes and forehead and an overall inhibition in gross motor functions.

Anger

It is a similar kind of pressure but more from the inside out and less restricting. My muscles feel tense and a kind of heat builds up in my head, my breathing becomes shallower.

Fear – a little more difficult

Faster heartbeat, similar restricting pressure on my upper body as in sadness just more from the spine outwards and less from the chest; a feeling of coldness along with a compulsion to twirl something in my hands or touch haptically interesting surfaces to calm myself. If I am really scared an additional need to curl up and cover my ears arises.

Happiness

A warm sensation starting in my solar plexus radiating from the centre towards the sides and then into my extremities as a kind of flutter, but without actual tremors. Again pressure in my chest but not uncomfortable; just so it feels stretched, like filled up with something warm and light. And a similar fluttery, warm sensation at the base of the skull towards the face.

Apparently contempt is another basic emotion but I do not have a sensational pattern for that; I do not remember ever having felt strong contempt towards anyone or anything. It is similar with jealousy; I just do not feel that, I have no idea why.

All other emotions are – for me – constructed as combinations of the ones above. Love is happiness in multiple levels directed towards persons; short bursts of joy from specific thoughts, touch, gestures from and towards that person alongside a constant resonating happiness just from the existence of this bond – plus numerous cognitive components like interest, harmony, sense of belonging and protection, etc.

(Emotional) pain is sadness and fear – and maybe anger.

Envy is anger and fear – and maybe contempt?

Heartache might be happiness and sadness and it feels so strange because it overlaps emotionally but the physical sensations are different..? It starts in the solar plexus, like happiness, but instead of radiating outwards it is more clenching and tightening and the radiating sensation is inhibiting or paralysing. Also there is a dampening of sensual input followed by the painful sensation behind my forehead which always precedes tears.

I think emotions are, in a physical sense, like japanese sauces. They all have the same five or six ingredients but taste very different because of the proportions of the individual ingredients.

Stress

Stress is also different; it results in a similar compensation compulsion as fear and sadness but is more concentrated in my head and less of a bodily sensation. My thoughts feel foggy and slow but at the same time somewhat erratic and I feel the need to concentrate on simple things which channel and restrict my sensory input.

How do other people feel emotions? And how is it to just “feel” ..?

Fifth Post

Growing up: I always thought that is something that just happens, mentally as well as physically. Physically it did happen but I get the impression mentally it didn’t. Since my childhood I’ve always thought there would be a moment when I start to think like an adult – or at least perceive the world differently. But for some reason I don’t think my perception changed that much.

I’ve always been waiting to toss my toys, lose interest in childish things and stop playing. I don’t know how this is with other adults but I cannot help but see myself as around 12 years old. Mentally that is. My bed is populated with stuffed animals which I treasure as much as my closest friends. They don’t have names – and never had – but something like a non-verbal identity concept and I would mourn the loss of any of them as deeply as if I lost a “real” friend. I take care to not make them unhappy and when I do have to put some in a storage box I try to make it as comfortable as I can.

I also still like toys, childish computer games (not exclusively, though) and I have to really restrain myself from poking interesting things with a stick, touching animals and flowers and run off to chase rabbits in a nearby field. Also, I still differentiate between myself and “adults”. I’m growing up now and I don’t think that will have changed by the time I’m 45. Is it like that for everybody and others are just better “adjusted”? Or does everyone have to convince themselves not to stop and poke an interesting looking plant they found on the footpath or rescue an earthworm from the street in the rain? Do other grown-ups just pretend not to laugh at funny sounding words repeating them to themselves?

I don’t say that I still think like a child but my growing ability to grasp complex connections didn’t change my view of the world as much as I expected it to considering the behaviour of “normal” adults. Sometimes I think they must believe me mentally retarded and if I’m bothered by that I don’t give in to the impulse to introduce myself to every plush animal in the toy department of the local department store. Or stop in a store and stroke a piece of clothing that is made of a funny fabric. Sometimes I don’t care. (There, “funny fabric” has a funny sound to it in itself. “Funny” is a funny word, anyway.)

If grown-ups see the world like I think they do it must be infinitely more boring. And if growing up is something that you have to do instead of something that just happens, I don’t want to do it.

My mother recently told me I already said that when I was eight years old.

Fourth Post

Today, I found that I do not automatically attribute thoughts to other people. But maybe no one does that?

My father asked me, if I intended on getting my driver’s license soon, I answered the question and about half an hour later I noticed that I did not ask myself why he asked that in this specific point of time and what he thought about my reply. Retrospectively it was as if I did not attribute any thoughts, other than those he voiced, to him. I suppose that is how I usually think since it wasn’t any special situation; I might have noticed now because I spent more time than usual with observing my thinking processes lately.

Maybe that is the difference between a true Theory of Mind and an intellectual compensation? But then, I’d have to know how other people function in such a situation… I have to study how I attribute thought to others in a social interaction where I actually have to make use of my planning and analysing skills to follow a conversation. Maybe I just compare the current conversation to similar ones I’ve had before?

A computer might be a good analogy; I see what is on the screen and I know – most of the times – which buttons I have to click to get the results I want to get without understanding how a computer functions. Sometimes, however, I click a button and get a totally different result and then I have to guess how to proceed from there. But the more I click on buttons, the more experience I get about which button does what. However, I still don’t know anything about programming and the underlying structures.

To extend the computer analogy to myself: whenever there are people around me, I’m running on battery and I can only charge it, when I’m alone – or with one of a handful of special people. If it runs low I have to change my energy plan to reduce performance and save power but if I can’t escape to solitude after a while I shut down. How someone can recharge batteries  with social interactions is a total mystery to me.

Third Post

I don’t remember how I first heard about Asperger’s Syndrome; probably in a film or some other entertainment media, but those usually depict a very one-sided view. I came into contact with the complexity of the behaviours and characteristics associated with AS during my reading about psychology only after I noticed that I seemed to function differently from most people around me.

At first, I thought I was psychopathic, because the most striking difference I noticed was the processing of emotions – mine and others’. One of the prevalent symptoms of psychopathy is a lack of empathy and understanding of feelings in others. “Understanding” in this case means “knowing how they feel”, the causes, behaviours and consequences associated with these feelings are understood very well and used to manipulate people in order to gain the highest possible benefits for oneself. I know that I can be very manipulative and so I studied the other characteristics of psychopathy but I soon found many discrepancies, for instance the shallowness of personal relationships and the disregard of other people’s opinions. I do care very deeply about people that are close to me – right now a total of five – and I put their happiness above mine, usually, but I do not care about people not close to me. But even if I do care, I have difficulties to actually understand what they feel, and why, I found myself unable to empathise in the original definition, I empathise emotionally if their emotions are accessible to me.

I know how certain situation impact on certain people and I know the appropriate reactions to these feelings, theoretically, but practically I only understand the momentary situation after thorough analysis. I am a good listener and, probably due to my detached viewpoint, often have a calming, rationalising effect on someone who is upset or scared. But this pragmatical approach can also get me into conflicts if someone is looking for true empathy for comfort and I am unable to provide that. I learned to identify these situations but I still struggle to overcome my initial impulse to investigate and dissect the situation and feelings scientifically to find a solution. I then tend to switch to a behaviour that most would associate with calming a frightened animal – stroking the fur/hair, saying comforting things in a low voice, etc. – because, to me, that would be the most comforting behaviour, if I was distressed.

I identify and connect with animals better than with humans, anyway. My best childhood friend was my cat who sadly died when I was younger and I still consider it to be the most painful loss I’ve ever experienced. I also connect as much emotions to my stuffed animals as I do with any other friendship and I still remember and grieve over all I lost during the course of my life – more than over many friends I lost. I’ve never given them names, though, they have non-verbal identity concepts which are hard to explain. I assume my connection with animals and objects is better because they don’t cause me any distress in interactions. All humans do, just to a varying degree – even my parents. It is just that for them and my best friends the enjoyment outweighs the stress most of the time and my capability to socialise is not consumed so quickly. But even there something I am unable to do is meeting someone spontaneously. I need time to prepare myself for interactions.

Usually, however, interacting socially equals a stressful and cognitively demanding activity to me. I am constantly analysing their behaviour and talk, look for patterns, compare it to other situations I experienced and decide how to react and what to say. I then compare the reaction with what I anticipated and go on from there. If the reaction is totally different from what I expected, I am lost. If there are more than one or two people I usually don’t say much unless it is a topic that interests me very much. I then have difficulties letting other people say anything and usually I’m not listening but waiting for a break in their word flow so I can say something about that again. That might be the reason why I often don’t remember other people’s opinions about something we talked about. Again, this is not true for people close to me because they in themselves, by being the person they are, present something that interests me. I usually don’t engage in socializing on my own accord and I can be perfectly happy if I don’t see anyone or don’t speak to anyone for days.

These are my main characteristics that I found to be repeated in descriptions about people with Asperger’s Syndrome to a more or lesser extent. I consider myself lucky to be able to use intellectual analysis to compensate for my lack in social intuition and I attribute most of that ability to the fact that I grew up with eight adults as the only child, that my parents are very open-minded and always let me be myself and partly also that I went to a Montessori elementary school rather than an ordinary school. These factors contributed greatly to my social abilities although they could not induce a sense of intuition, instead they gave me a large social vocabulary with which I can now analyse interactions and situations.

There are, also, all the little behavioural oddities that I display and which can often be found in descriptions of other individuals with Asperger’s and about which I found out when I read more about the syndrome. Here are a few examples: I have always been fascinated with water in any phase, especially with the (deep) sea and the combination of water and light. One of my first really good paintings was a bottle and a glass of water with some spilled drops on a wooden table and I remember staring for an hour into a Volvic bottle in the sun because I loved the way the bottle and the water fractured the light. I have always had unusual interests as a child, I started to speak and differentiate words from 9 months onwards, I taught myself how to read in kindergarten and I developed a fascination for Russia and the Russian alphabet and later poisons when I was in elementary school.

I have some behaviours that could be called motor tics, for instance, I tend to stand on the outer edge of my feet and walk on the balls of my feet when I’m not wearing shoes; I flap my arms up and down when I am waiting or thinking about something while standing, I rock back and forth when I’m concentrating or I don’t feel well and I chew on my lips most of the time. There might be some more behavioural oddities I am not aware of.

Also, I am very sensitive towards certain sounds, for instance a broken pencil or a felt-tip marker on paper or a knife scraping on baking paper make me feel sick. I can hear sounds people around me don’t notice and I can see rather well in the dark. I am also rather sensitive towards smells I dislike and I am unable to eat something of which I do not like the smell. I notice when something I like was put together with something I don’t like the smell of and I cannot eat it any more. However, I love good smells, my favourite being the olive&jasmine candle by Muji, and I love to surround myself with things that smell good. I have a greater tolerance for chemical smells and sometimes I even like some of them that others dislike but most organic bad smells are repulsive for me.

Of course, I have no idea if not everyone is functioning like that and other people just don’t find this odd but I’ve always noticed that there was something blocking exchange with other people around me. I suppose it could be considered as an impairment if I craved social contacts and belongingness, because I don’t know how to achieve that. I am just lucky that I don’t miss what I lack. The discomfort I feel when I am amongst people can be avoided by avoiding groups of people and that is fine with me.

Second Post

I have no intention of adding another page in which some unimportant person has to tell the world about their feelings, so, this is not for the world, but for myself.

And since my life is not really filled with things worthwhile to be fixed in writing, I will try and write about my thoughts instead and hopefully, this will help me understand them and myself better over time. I have tried to do that with an old fashioned diary but my perfectionism keeps me from finishing more than a few entries before I find a flaw in my overall concept and I have to start again. This, then, is a try to make use of the greater flexibility of digital notekeeping because if I find a flaw in my layout I can change it without erasing all previous entries.

The reason why I started this is that I recently found a label why I seem to think differently from most other people I know. I suspect I have Asperger’s Syndrome. My therapist is sceptical but I can see why. I have tried to convey my feelings in a most straightforward manner to her so that necessarily made the impression of me being somewhat in touch with my feelings. Even then she repeatedly told me I would express anything to do with emotions very rationally and cognitively – but that is not how I expressed it, that is how I feel. Feelings, to me, are internal stimuli, just like sound and light are external stimuli, which have to be recognised, analysed and evaluated. That might sound very dry and it is not as robotic as I suppose most would read this; furthermore, I did not decide to function in that way, I just do. I can and do have deep feelings but I repeatedly get the impression I process them differently from most individuals.

Since I am now on my way to an official diagnosis and, as I already mentioned, my therapist is sceptical, I tried to confirm my theory for myself by searching to disprove it. I have once read that this is the most convincing strategy to prove a theory because it is – as far as it can be – free from the human tendency to find the evidence they are looking for. This approach is a little difficult because Asperger’s is a very diverse syndrome which is not classified by a specific set of symptoms but by a combination of various symptoms that result in specific behaviours and personality aspects. This means that there are no symptoms of which one could say they are absolutely necessary for a diagnosis.

The first possibility is, what is also known as “medical student syndrome”; i. e. I found symptoms of Asperger’s within myself because I falsely categorised some of my personality aspects and developed other matching traits and behaviours as I read about them. This is a somewhat disturbing theory because my previous theory was that I am sociopathic – and it means I could have developed those behaviour patterns if I had read about that more. This possibility is disproved because there are many behaviours I know I have been doing for a very long time.

The second possibility is that I developed these behaviours due to social and developmental influences. The issue with this approach is that I have had a very happy and untroubled childhood surrounded by caring, sociable adults. There is no obvious reason why I should have so tremendous difficulties with social settings and why they should be so exhausting to me. As far as I can see I am the only true introvert in my family although my father does display difficulties to handle emotions both within himself and within others. I do not know, however, if this is just due to his being a typical man or if it is something more towards processing emotion differently. I cannot fully discredit this approach – and this is what my therapist would choose to pursue – but there are some behavioural and developmental aspects that correlate strongly with my original hypothesis. I have a considerably high IQ and I learned to speak when I was not even one year old. Despite encouragement by my parents I have never been social on my own accord, I had to be forced to go to the daycare centre and kindergarten and I disliked children’s parties. I preferred to talk to adults rather than someone of my age – and I still do – and I expressed myself quite eloquently from an early age on. I taught myself how to read before I went to school and spent most time, from there on, sitting in a corner reading one book after another. On the contrary, I believe had I not grown up in a household with eight adults and me as the only child, I would have become much more turned inwards.

The third possibility is that some other disorder can explain my difficulties in interacting with the outside world more effectively and comprehensively. As I mentioned my initial theory was sociopathy but that did not match many of my behaviours and personality aspects. I cannot say I looked at all psychological disorders and their co-morbidities but I have yet to find something that can even closely explain so much of my talents as well as difficulties as Asperger’s Syndrome.

Ergo, I still think that my hypothesis holds true and the diagnosis is correct – I will, of course, try to be open for other possibilities.

I will describe how I came to that conclusion in the next post and, hopefully, divert more to the course of my thoughts and my perspective of the world once I got all these introductory points done.